|
|
WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE: 5. CONCLUSION
|
WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE
5. CONCLUSION
Pinkerton is unreliable because he lies on professional matters for
personal reasons. To some on the tube conferences putting their faith
in Pinkerton may be dangerous to the point of being life-threatening.
Andre Jute
Part of a series of articles:
WHY STEWART PINKERTON IS UNRELIABLE
1. BACKGROUND
2. THE STATISTICS OF MALICE
3. PINKERTON'S IGNORANCE OF THE BASICS
4. PINKERTON LIES ON PROFESSIONAL MATTERS FOR PERSONAL REASONS
5. CONCLUSION
|
After 100 hours on public view on the internet no challenge to this
|
You're actually counting?
|
It's OCD... A disorder shared by his amanuensis, John Byrns.
Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA
|
|
analysis of Pinkerton's unreliability and the conclusion has been
offered, no counteranalysis even from Pinkerton's friends and
fellow-travellers, merely smokescreens and personal abuse.
The analysis and conclusions stand. Pinkerton is unreliable because he
lies on professional matters for personal reasons. Since tube
hobbyists, the particular target of Pinkerton's malice, work with
lethal voltages, Pinkerton may be dangerous to the point of being
life-threatening.
Andre Jute
|
|
Hmmm...interesting. How fast do you type, Andre?
|
Depends on his meds at the moment. Much faster when they fail.
|
Depends on which kinds of meds he's on, right? Why couldn't be be speeding?
The last time we had someone on RAO this prolific, they speed-typed for
maybe a year or more, and then suddenly disappered. It has been said that
they met a sudden end at their own hand.
|
Or got their Adam's Apple caught in the keys perhaps.
I've always regretted not learning touch typing. Then again, typing
fast can be a temptation to verbosity, prolixity and various other
long words. .
|
Alan Derrida of unsainted memory claimed to use a voice recognition
text program like Dragon, in order to spew his reams of rubbish.
|
Dear God! That's a very frightening thought. Hitherto I always
imagined the damage an individual poster could do was constrained by
the limitations of touch typing.
|
|
On a lighter note, and just a few steps away from this, a pal of
mine recently bought a new Epson scanner with which was
bundled state of the art OCR software with translation to
and from twelve languages. I sent him a review from a
Swedish mag, which he scanned and translated into English.
It was hilarious - Prof Stanley Unwin could not have
done a better job:-)
|
|
|
|
Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA
|
|
|
|